← Blog archive

Local · September 14, 2014

In Search of Hess' Triangle - Part 2

In Part 1 of In Search of Hess' Triangle, I presented some historical maps of the area and did some analysis using modern GIS software.  In this post, I'll share some historical news articles about the 7th Avenue Extension and Hess' Triangle, and show a few more of the tiny parcels that still exist in the west village today.

First up is a New York Times article from 1911, written just after the approval of the Board of Estimate of $3,000,000 to move forward with the plan.  Pennsylvania Station was recently completed, and north-south transportation options on the west side were lacking:

"...although some objection has been made by individual property owners, the need of providing a new west side thoroughfare giving quick connection between the midtown business section and the industrial centre west of Broadway and north of Franklin and Canal Streets has been universally recognized."1911.pdf

I'd love to see what some of these objections look like, and wonder if they are archived anywhere.  The article concludes with a list of landmarks and prominent buildings that will be affected by the 7th Avenue Extension, but it appears that Mr. Hess' Voorhis Building is not notable enough for mention.

Another NYT article from 1913, just prior to the start of demolition, goes into greater detail about landmarks that will be lost.  1913NYT.pdf

"In all, about 253 structures will be torn down for the 100-foot thoroughfare, which will give a wide straight avenue from the commercial district around the wholesale grocery district about Franklin Street to Seventh Avenue and the upper part of the city."

Was this the Hunts Point of it's day?

"Some one has said that this great municipal improvement will virtually cut the heart out of old Greenwich Village, and that is true."

Interestingly, the city was allowed to take control of the properties before the owners were compensated.  "Hearings on the properties are now being conducted...The right to demolish buildings for a public improvement before their value is fixed by a commission is provided for in the city charter."  I would really love to find more information on this, including transfer paperwork or deeds.  Does anyone know where to look?

Towards the end of this article we can read a description of David Hess' Voorhees building, but it isn't named:

"The entire Fourth Street front between Grove and Christopher Streets, 66.4 feet on Fourth Street will be torn out.  This is occupied by a seven-story apartment and it is one of the few doomed structures now entirely vacant. A part of the little park in front of the building will also go".

There it is!  This contradicts some modern articles about Hess' Triangle that state that the apartment building on the site was five stories tall.  According to the historic maps in part 1, the frontage is actually 66.2 feet, so the article's description is off by 2.4 inches.

_Plate_10__Bounded_by_W._14th_Street__Sixth_Avenue__Cornelia_Street__Bleecker_Street__Barrow_Street__Bedford_Street__Christopher_Street__Hudson_Street__W._10th_Street__Washington_Street__Charles_Street__West_Street__Hudson_River________Gans

It turns out there was an article written in the New York Times the day after the tiles were laid.  It's short and sweet, and confirms that Hess' Triangle's tiles were installed on Wednesday, July 26th, 1922.  I wonder if they had to get a permit for this work, and I wonder if there's any record of it.

1922NYT.pdf

Last but not least is an article from the Hartford Courtant from 1928.  The piece is called "Gotham Every Day" and is comprised of little snippets of NYC lore.  It gives a pretty standard account of Hess' Triangle, but also states that David M. Hess died in 1907, 6 years before the 7th Avenue Extension was built and 15 years before the tiles were laid.  How can we figure out how he died and who executed his estate?

1928hartfordcourant.pdf

This article also has a funny story about a landowner who pranked the city, stating that he was going to donate land for a public park... when the time came for the ribbon-cutting, it was an 8 square foot parcel of land.  Trolled Hard.

This weekend, I finally had a chance to visit the site in person, and took a couple of graphite rubbings.  I'm working on getting one of these framed, and may offer a print if anyone is interested.

20140914_215154

As we saw in part 1, Hess' Triangle is no longer its own parcel of land, and was consolidated with the neighboring parcel sometime in the 30's. (I would love to find a property record for this as well).  However, there are still several small parcels leftover from the 7th Avenue extension that still exist today.

Using QGIS, I filtered Manhttan's MapPluto shapefile for parcels under 100 square feet (there are 56 of these "microparcels".  Below is a map that shows all of them as polygons with an associated marker.  You can see that several are located along the 7th avenue extension.

Zoom out to see others, and click on a marker to see the Address, BBL, Owner's name, and lot size.

That's all for now.  Thanks for reading!  I would like to locate archival documents for the various transfers of Hess' Triangle over the years (when the city first carved it up, and when it was sold to the neighboring lot in the 1930s).  If anyone knows where to look for these, please let me know in the comments.

This post was migrated from my old WordPress blog. Embedded maps and links to third-party sites may no longer work.

Comments (archived, closed)

  1. Ro Pirog ·

    Thanks for sharing your information! It proves pretty interesting the depth you went into your search. I also found it about the triangle on Atlas Obscura.

  2. Olivier Guiberteau ·

    Hi Chris, my name is Olivier Guiberteau, I'm a freelance journalist writing a piece for the BBC on the Hess Triangle. Your two posts here are fantastic, and really well researched. I would love to speak to you on the topic if you have some time.

    Thanks

  3. Scott Baker ·

    I'd like more information about this plot of land, which I understand is the smallest in NYC.
    Does the property extend below the sidewalk - the law for NYC typically says from the center of the earth to the sky, except where interrupted by utilities, subways (pertinent in this case). Some states disallow below ground property because there are mineral rights that can be bought by companies, but not NYC.
    Also, is the property to the outer triangle or just the inner one with the plaque? If it's the latter, disregard what I wrote below; it's too small and it just won't work.
    These questions are important for what I had in mind: an enclosed hydraulic 1-person elevator going up to a gangway to the roof the cigar store, which would be redone as a rooftop park. The developers could even throw in revitalization of the surrounding sidewalk as a community amenity (I have another idea for that too).
    Since this IS private property, the city can't object because they have no claim over it. The cigar shop roof will probably need strengthening for a rooftop park for a dozen or so people at a time, but they will make it back in foot traffic and souvenirs (will that be the city's smallest rooftop park then?).
    Before you dismiss me as a crank, take a look at this other project I have been working on for the past 4.5 years: http://bit.ly/BroadsheetRA1 From the largest development to the smallest, you could say.
    I can model this in Sketch-up modeling software as I did the RiverArch, from the front page article in The Broadsheet, cited above.